Immediate reactions
From the time of its completion, the Barbican Centre has attracted strongly contrasting reactions. It was opened in 1982, at a point when architectural opinion had already begun to move away from the forms and materials associated with its design. As a result, it was received in a climate that was not always sympathetic to its approach.
Critical division
Some observers regarded the Barbican Centre as a major achievement. They emphasised the ambition of the project and the scale of what had been attempted, particularly the integration of multiple cultural functions within a single complex.
Others were more critical. Attention was often drawn to the extensive use of exposed concrete, the scale and mass of the structure, and the complexity of its internal arrangement. The difficulty of navigation became a recurring theme in many assessments of the building.
Specific criticisms
Criticism was not limited to general impressions. Particular aspects of the building were examined in detail. The acoustic performance of the concert hall, for example, was the subject of ongoing discussion and modification.
The arrangement of internal spaces was also criticised, both as an example of architectural ambition and as a source of practical difficulty for visitors.
Changing perception
Over time, perceptions of the Barbican Centre have shifted. Buildings of the period in which it was designed have come to be reassessed, and the Barbican is now more widely recognised as an important example of post-war architecture.
Its status has been reinforced by its continued use and by the range of activities it supports. It has become an established part of London’s cultural landscape.
Experience of use
Regular users of the building often develop a familiarity with its layout that reduces the difficulties experienced by first-time visitors. The complexity of the building, which may initially be seen as a disadvantage, can also contribute to a more varied experience.
Visitors may encounter different routes and spaces on successive visits, rather than following a single predictable path. The presence of the lake, terraces, and conservatory adds to this variety, providing contrasts with the more enclosed internal areas.
Overall assessment
The Barbican Centre continues to provoke a range of responses. It is regarded by some as a highly successful and distinctive environment, and by others as a building whose design presents continuing challenges.
These differing views reflect the nature of the project itself. The Barbican was conceived as an ambitious and comprehensive development, and its success is often judged in relation to that ambition.
Its continued use and prominence suggest that, whatever the criticisms, it has established a lasting role within the cultural life of London.
